Lawtology

The one AI partner thatsees the whole case.

Leave routine work such as transcribing recordings and cleaning up spreadsheets to AI. From issue analysis that ties evidence to facts, to knowledge-graph precedent matching, to a Hangul (HWP) editor built right in. You focus on one thing: the strategy to win.

The demo requires a sign-in. Demo accounts are issued when you contact us.

Lawtology
Settings · Templates+ New case
‹ My cases

Loan recovery — KRW 50 million

Civil · LoanFor plaintiff · Pre-trial · Parallel criminal complaint
D-6Complainant interview · 09-29
4 proceedings+ Proceeding
Main actionSeoul Central Dist. Ct. · 2026GaHap1234 · PlaintiffActiveHearing 10-05D-126 filings
Criminal (fraud)Seoul Central Prosecutors · 2026HyungJe4321 · ComplainantInvestigatingInterview 09-29D-62 filings
AttachmentSeoul Central Dist. Ct. · 2026KaHap567 · CreditorClosedNo date1 filing
NegotiationOut of courtActiveNo date1 filing
OverviewIssues2Precedents3Facts5Evidence3Timeline10
+ Add information

Fictional case

Fictional case

AI writes it. Only what the lawyer confirms stays.

AI turns scattered chats, recordings and receipts into one case and drafts the filing. Every sentence carries its source, and only what the lawyer confirms stays.

Give your team's time to what matters

Hundreds of chat screenshots, long recordings, piles of receipts. AI cuts the time it takes to turn raw material into facts, so the whole firm can focus on the substance of the case.

Back into the case in a minute

When a hearing is postponed and you reopen the case months later, the auto-built timeline and AI Q&A let you check past context right away, so getting back into the case takes less effort.

Civil or criminal, it's one case

Even when a civil action, a criminal complaint and an attachment run at once, case information builds up in one place. Facts, evidence, issues and dates live in a single context.

Evidence in any form

Call recordings, KakaoTalk chats, bank statements in Excel, even a blurry phone photo of a contract. Just upload it. No converting or tidying first: whatever form it takes, it goes in as it is, and AI separates speakers, turns it into text and files it inside the case.

Add informationUploaded files and typed notes land on the same review screen once processed
Drag files here

Audio · PDF · Hangul · Word · Excel · Photos · Messenger chats · Email

M4A
Call with defendant 0315.m4a
48 min 12 s · transcribed, plaintiff and defendant separated
3 facts · 1 to review
TXT
KakaoTalk chat export.txt
1,204 messages · Nov 2023 – May 2024
2 facts · 1 to review
XLSX
KB transactions 2024.xlsx
312 rows · deposits, withdrawals and counterparties read
1 fact

Fictional case

Every fact maps 1:1 to its source

AI hallucinations are caught by sources and lawyer review. Every fact the LLM produces is mapped 1:1 to its exact location in the original file: page, row, or second of the recording. Anything that cannot be confirmed in the source does not stay a fact, and a filing uses only facts a lawyer has confirmed.

Nothing that isn't in the source

Every fact the AI extracts is checked against its location in the original. If it can't be confirmed there, it doesn't stay a fact, so a plausible hallucination never reaches your filing.

Numbers checked twice

Amounts and dates decide cases. They are scanned again from the original to confirm an exact match, so errors don't slip through.

A legal web of support and rebuttal

Not just a list. Each fact is tied to the element it serves: whether it supports your position or impeaches the other side's claim.

Issue map and knowledge-graph precedents

Go beyond listing facts. Evidence and arguments are woven together element by element into an issue map with no gaps. Add a precedent database built on knowledge-graph technology, and the precedents closest to your case's facts are matched instantly to build a solid argument.

ISSUE GRAPHWas a KRW 50 million loan agreement formed?Unanswered · AlertCivil Act Art. 598 LoanKG similar precedents 2
sourcebasisbasisoriginaloriginaloriginalcitesstructure 4/4 matchIssueKRW 50M loanWas it formed?Their claim“It was a gift”Answer p.2Our rebuttalNo proof + texts, callSecond briefOur claimLoan agreementAgreement + deliveryFact2024-03-01 KRW 50M sentUndisputed · confirmedFact“Use it till you repay”Disputed · confirmedFact“I’ll repay when paid”Disputed · unreviewedFilingDefendant’s answerReceived 06-02Ex. 1Bank transactionsrow 14Ex. 2KakaoTalk chatmsg 214Ex. 3Call recording00:42:13PrecedentS. Ct. 2003Da12345Loan formationKG · structure 4/4Seoul High 2023Na20451Gift defense rejectedKG · structure 2/4Seoul C. 2022GaHap5501Promise = evidenceSIMILAR PRECEDENTS (KG)1234
ConfirmedUnreviewedTheir claim · citesKG similar precedent① – ④ points matching the precedent
SELECTED PRECEDENT

Seoul High Ct. 2023Na20451

Decided Sep 14, 2023

In a loan dispute, a gift defense fails without specific proof of a gift agreement.

Structure 4/4 match with this case
1IssueWas a loan formed=PrecedentLoan formation
2Their claimIt was a gift=PrecedentGift defense
3Fact · Ex.2“Use it till you repay”=PrecedentPromise to repay
4Fact · Ex.1Transfer, admitted=PrecedentAdmitted transfer
Judgment · p.5Link to this issue
Also found · Seoul Central 2022GaHap5501 structure 2/4

Fictional case · precedent numbers and holdings are examples too

Tailored drafts and a built-in HWP editor

Set draft formats to match your firm's drafting style. Drafts are generated with exhibit numbers mapped to every sentence. And with a Hangul (HWP) editor built into the service, you can edit, save and download in one place, right in the browser, without opening a separate word processor.

‹ Loan recovery — KRW 50 million

Second brief

Main action · 2026GaHap1234DraftingDue: hearing D-12
01Their claims
02Rebuttal
03Issues and facts
04Editing draft · Hangul (HWP) editor
Second brief — Editor준비서면 2차.hwpxCloseSave (new version)
The Hangul editor built into Lawtology, editing a Korean brief (준비서면 2차.hwpx) with the title set to 16 pt, bold and centered
Sources used in this draft · all confirmed by the lawyer
1. (a)Defendant's gift claim and lack of proofAnswer · p.2Confirmed
1. (b)The KRW 50M transfer and defendant's messageEx.1 · row 14Ex.2 · msg 214Confirmed
3 sources linked · synced with editorDownload HWPSave and approve

Fictional case

Questions firms ask

For anything not covered here, write to contact@lawtology.com.

Which cases can it handle?

Cases where proceedings of different kinds run together, such as a civil claim, a criminal complaint and a provisional attachment, are handled as one. Facts, evidence, issues and hearing dates accumulate inside a single case.

Does the AI make things up?

Facts are drawn only from the uploaded material and the lawyer's notes. Anything that cannot be confirmed at its location in the source does not stay a fact. Amounts and dates are re-read from the source passage rather than taken from model output, and are rejected if they differ.

Does what the AI writes go straight into the filing?

A filing uses only facts the lawyer has confirmed. Sentences that rest on unconfirmed facts stay locked, and nothing is filed without the lawyer's approval, which is logged.

Is our firm's material used elsewhere?

Case data, templates and edit history are isolated per firm and never used as training data for other users. Uploaded originals are never modified, and every change is kept in a history that can be reverted.

Do HWP files need a separate program?

A Hangul (HWP, HWPX) editor is built into the service, so editing, saving and downloading happen in the browser. Export to PDF is included.

How do we get started?

Send a request and we reply to the email you leave with a demo account. The demo runs at app.lawtology.com.

Your next case, with Lawtology

Demo accounts are issued when you contact us.